Bulk layer · machine-collected · graded at E2 or below · never curated

How do these up to three compare, on what their sellers published?

machine-collected listingsmachine-readable: /api/v1/listings

Three tools

Everything below is from the seller’s own listing
COMPARE ▸ SIDE BY SIDE
carrick-tools/carrickCTcarrick-tools/carrickcarrick-tools
ToumAI Multilingual AI Assistants for Dynamics 365TOToumAI Multilingual AI Assistants for Dynamics 365toumai
agenticpay-dev/agenticpayADagenticpay-dev/agenticpayagenticpay-dev
Starting price per year
Not published
Free tier$0.00 per month, annualised
Not published
What you buy
Not published
Software you licence
Not published
Seller mentions
Not published
Dynamics 365Only one naming a system
Not published
Built for
Not published
retail
Not published
How you pay
Not published
FreeOnly one you can meter
Not published
How it ships
Not published
SaaS
Not published
Buy it on
GitHub
Microsoft
GitHub
Last changed at source
2026-08-23
2026-02-11
2026-08-23
What to ask them

Ask them about

  • What it costs
  • What it connects to
  • Who it is built for
  • Named customers running it

This seller answered every question we track. Ask for named customers.

Ask them about

  • What it costs
  • What it connects to
  • Who it is built for
  • Named customers running it
3 of 3 · from each seller's own listingNO SCORE · NO RANKING

We do not rank these, and there is no score. Ranking would need a defined cohort and a published method, and we have neither. Where one tool is measurably ahead on something both sellers published, it is marked. Everything else is what each seller chose to say, and what they chose to leave out is in the last row.