What is this product allowed to say, and in whose voice?
State the object. State the fact. State the basis. Stop.
Declarative, specific, short, neutral. One material fact per sentence where possible, and interpretation kept visually separate from sourced fact. A view does not warm up, set the scene, or explain that the market is evolving rapidly — it states what it is looking at and what is true of it.
{field} verified · {basis} · checked {freshness}.Vendor claims {fact}. Not independently verified.{field} not established.Sources disagree on {field}.{field} {direction} {old} → {new} · {date}.{count} implementations compared on {requirements} stated requirements.{name} meets {met}/{total} stated requirements. This is not a product rating.Law 68 — a claim names its claimant. An unattributed claim rendered in the product’s own voice has been laundered through us, and the evidence ladder cannot see that because it happens at the level of the sentence.
A banned word in quotation marks, alone, is a MENTION and is permitted — 'No rating, no percentile, no ranked "best"' is the contract being stated, not broken. Use/mention is the same distinction that exempts quoted vendor copy (Law 69): reporting a word is not adopting it. A real violation reads 'the best tool for X', never the bare term in quotes.